I enjoyed Bridge Baron 10. Apart from its quirky Acol
bidding (it is an American program!) the standard of play
was not bad at all, provided you increased the computer's
"thinking time".So how does version 11
compare?
The program has lots of excellent features such as
actual ACBL pairs tournaments to play in. You choose the
event and then at the end of each hand you are shown the
traveller with your matchpoints and your running total
and position. You can also play teams - you play at one
table and then the computer plays all four hands at the
other giving you a match position (in IMPs) either at the
end of each hand or at the end of the stanza. Of course
if duplicate is not your game you can opt for rubber or
Chicago.
There are 72 special problem hands for you to try out.
Most are of these are well put together and will make you
think a lot.
Certainly if you enjoy trying out weird and wonderful
conventions you will have no cause for complaint. Added
to its repertoire this time are such things as Lebensohl,
Inverted Minor Raises, Responsive Doubles, not mention
Smolen and Minor-Suit Stayman (no I didn't what they were
either). Don't worry though, you choose which conventions
to play, as well as those of your opponents. One nice
feature is that you can get the computer to generate
deals so that you can actually practise a particular
convention.
The computer will always offer a hint if you are
unsure what to bid and mostly its suggestions are sound.
There are also bidding flowcharts available but, though
well intentioned, they do not quite work for me.
I shall take the manufacturer's word that they have
improved the standard of play. Certainly I was quite
impressed with the program's performance on all the hands
I tested it out on.
All in all this is an highly impressive package let
down by just one aspect, its Acol bidding. Most hands are
bid in text book fashion (if only because Acol and
Standard American are not that different) but when it
comes to No
Trump rebids and anything to do with 4-card majors it
tends to slip up. For instance it bids in the American
fashion such that a 2NT rebid over a 2-level response
shows a minimum opener (with 15 or more it just rebids
3NT).
On one hand the computer held:
S. A643
H. QJ62
D. AQ10
C. K5
This is a hand that at Acol you would normally open 1H
and then rebid 2NT over a 2C response, but the computer
instead chose 1S opening followed by a 2H rebid which,
where I come from, guarantees a 5-card Spade suit.
I have to say though that despite this minor failing
this is a program well worth purchasing.
Mike Swanson
www.diamondbridge.co.uk